Grant v Australian Knitting Mills 1936 AC 85 Case summary last updated at 20/01/2020 15:57 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills, is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care.
Richard Thorold Grant Appellant v. Australian Knitting Mills, Limited, and others Respondents FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA. JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL, delivered the 21ST OCTOBER, 1935.
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills: PC 21 Oct 1935 Australia The Board considered how a duty of care may be established: ‘All that is necessary as a step to establish a tort of actionable negligence is define the precise relationship from which the duty to take care is deduced.
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills 1936 AC 85 By michael Posted on September 3, 2013 Un egorized Product liability – retailers and manufacturers held liable for skin irritation caused by knitted garment.
Richard Thorold Grant v Australian Knitting Mills, and others Australia Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is a paid feature.
Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills 1936 - Padlet ... Bois
Australian knitting mills pty ltd 19360 In the winter of 1931, Dr Grant purchased two sets of underclothes. After wearing the underclothes on a number of occasions over a three-week period, he developed an itch.